Encryption made digital interactions private. The next step: making them provably authentic.
See it in productionVereign provides the authenticity layer that sits beneath existing infrastructure. Each organisation holds its own cryptographic identity and verifies counterparties directly — sovereign, auditable, and independent.
$30B
Annual cost of manual administrative transactions in US healthcare alone — the price of fragmented identity and broken trust infrastructure
CAQH Index 2023
€6.5B
Annual ICT operational losses reported by European banks — the cost of fragile trust infrastructure
European Banking Authority (EBA) 2023
741
Bilateral agreements needed by 39 European TSOs under current trust architecture — O(n²) scaling
ENTSO-E analysis
I've spent 20 years building trust infrastructure. The biggest open question was always: who guarantees trust between organisations without becoming the bottleneck — and a target? Vereign has the answer.
After nearly three decades of testing security assumptions, the fundamental flaw is clear: trust models based on perimeter defense break hard at the organizational walls. Vereign makes trust verifiable at the point of interaction where it's needed most.
Stargate — Stargate connects organisations into a verified network using KERI-based bilateral cryptographic trust — no certificate authority, no single point of failure, O(n) scaling. Each organisation controls its own keys. Verification is direct.
Explore Stargate →SEAL — SEAL (Secure Authentic Exchange Layer) is the open-source messaging layer that makes communication verifiable end-to-end. Sender identity, integrity proof, and attribution chain are cryptographically inseparable from the content — even at the unsecured edge.
Explore SEAL →PKI and OAuth are correctly engineered for what they were designed for. They were not designed for multi-stakeholder, cross-institutional trust at scale. The Trust Architecture page explains the structural gap — and the mathematical case for why a different foundation is required.
Read the analysis →800,000+ verified interactions per month across Swiss healthcare since April 2025
See all use cases →Verified delivery of sensitive security findings — penetration test reports with cryptographic proof of authenticity via SEAL
See all use cases →GLEIF-validated bilateral trust for KYC, AML, and cross-institutional verification
See all use cases →Zero-trust bilateral verification for classified inter-agency data exchange
See all use cases →Verifiable chain of custody for clinical trial data and regulatory submissions
See all use cases →Authenticated mesh for grid operators requiring O(n) trusted inter-TSO communication
See all use cases →Verifiable document provenance and chain of custody for cross-border legal proceedings and regulatory filings. Secure communication with clients without apps or onboarding.
See all use cases →Auditable, attribution-complete records for DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 obligations
See all use cases →Encryption made digital communication private. The next step is making it provably authentic. Traditional approaches delegate this verification to centralised third parties — an architecture that concentrates risk and limits how organisations can establish trust across institutional boundaries. DKMS puts the certificate authority at the edge: each organisation manages its own keys, verifies counterparties directly, and maps its real organisational complexity into its trust infrastructure.
See how the architecture works
Whether you are evaluating trust architecture for your organisation or exploring partnership opportunities, we would like to hear from you.
